this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2024
413 points (99.8% liked)

Futurology

3393 readers
175 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 19 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Don’t aircraft still use leaded fuel to this day?

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

So uh, there was some studying being done at my local university about mapping health issues for residents living closer to airports and.... It ain't too great. :(

[–] kcuf@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (3 children)

That's probably related to all the other chemicals they use at airports (eg forever chemicals in fire retardant). 100LL (100 octane low lead) is only used in small piston engines, which is a very small population. They're trying alternatives that don't use lead, but I'm reading that the top contender is eating through paint and possibly gaskets and seals in the plane, which isn't safe either.

[–] ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, fuels are funny like that, rocket fuel kept dissolving chunks of ground crew for the longest time

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I can't tell if this is a joke or legit lmao

A bit hyperbolic but seriously, look up hypergolic propellants.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)