this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
1064 points (98.9% liked)

Facepalm

601 readers
1 users here now

Anything that makes you apply your hand to your face.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zloubida@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago (2 children)

As a progressive Christian, that's something I want to say almost everytime I read somethung written by an Evangelical.

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

I am not religious, but I have devoted a good chunk of time to reading the bible. If I can do it, someone who essentially stands to gain nothing by reading it can do it, so can and should all these greasy-ass politicians who use it as a political prop. The only thing more irksome than inflexibly, overly literal religious people, are phony religious people who don't even know what they're talking about. And then the next level of annoying beyond that is yhe voting public who allows the charade. They should be the ones pressing these politicians. "Two Corinthians" Donald? What the fuck are you talking about?

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No, see, you can do it because you have nothing to lose. If they actually read and understand the Bible, then they have to start living according to it, and that would suck. "For I say to you it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of the needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven?" No thank you sir, that would ruin my prosperity gospel!

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

To be fair to the camel, God hadn't heard of the Byford Dolphin incident yet.

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Well that was a horrible read.

[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The bible’s a neat old book of parables and early concepts of morals. Like most things, the fanbase is probably the worst part.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Morals?

Like the devil convincing God to torture the faithful? Throughout the parable, I can hear Satan trying to suppress his laughter as he listens to Him godsplain Job's devotion.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 6 points 7 months ago

If more people followed the lessons of the good Samaritan and the sheep and the goats, we might be better off

Also people who do a lot of backflips to justify readings where the text says "help the poor" and turn it into "don't help the poor" are probably scumbags.

[–] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

If you like that then you might enjoy the funny possible euphemism of the whole "washing of feet" thing. It could be read as the actual act of washing feet but there's some places where it's definitely being used as a euphemism for getting your dick wet.

That slight ambiguity could mean that the last supper included an orgy with a lot of same sex pairings - which to be fair is pretty in keeping with the MO of a lot of other cult leadership throughout history. Most of the prudish sex negative stuff comes more from Paul's additions than directly through Jesus. But hoo boy do Christians get real mad when you imply this as a possibility.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 7 months ago

The pundits don't care what the Bible says, they like that their followers instead believe what they say the religion is about

You need the common folk to read and understand it if you want the religious leaders to lose their hold

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] zloubida@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

We may be more numerous than you think 😉.

(However still a minority indeed; but I prefer to be right alone than wrong with the crowd)