this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
389 points (94.7% liked)
memes
16673 readers
2829 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm pretty sure it's AI generated; which is really weird because I'm pretty sure there are plenty of 50's era images featuring a smiling woman in the kitchen.
Yeah, I was going to say. Even without the usual tells I just could feel that it seemed AI. It's that glossiness I think; even with a filter over top of it it looks off.
It has plenty of the usual tells. Just look at the stovetop. Look at the casserols and details on the wall
For me it's the waist. It's really thin, which would be ok for a 60's illustration but the contour of her dress doesn't match before and after the forearm.
The shadow for the cupboard door knob above the text is a tell, as is the stove top and each knob on the range being different.
It's 100% ai generated
Not 100%. The text is legible.
Sure, the text might be added on top by someone
Yeah, but you'd have to search for those, and who has time for that in 2024?
To be fair, making if physically cursed instead of only conceptually is an improvement.
And this image is just a clever rehash of those 🤷
This looks like bad human art not bad AI art, but I may be wrong
0 reverse image search results. the fucked up shadows and broken waist/skirt are what confirm it as AI for me—not even the most lazy human artist who can render this well would draw those so poorly.