this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
876 points (96.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

26121 readers
985 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (9 children)

The argument of if applications should be deployed via web browser is an independent discussion.

That discussion begins with the question "Should applications be deployed via web browser?" and ends with the response "No"

[–] oo1@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

yeah, substance > style.

the content/facts/information is what should matter, make it accessible. share it.

let the audience access it however best suits them.

[–] fkn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I would argue that json has become the data format method of choice for most applications.

What you want is mostly what json is, not html.

[–] oo1@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

The format doesn't bother me too much.
json can be great for sure.

But I reckon some people could still bung a load of unnecessarily complex layout and aesthetic data in there, and potentially screw up the data structure and still make it harder to access than need be.

I accept that, if the json is structured logically, it should handle both substantive and layout data, and probably easiest to get to either the content or the formatting.

load more comments (6 replies)