Politics Unfiltered
This community shares news and articles from a wide range of political perspectives—socialist, liberal, conservative, independent, libertarian, Green Party, Pirate Party, and more.
The goal isn’t to push one side but to give people a fuller picture of what's going on in the world.
You’ll find everything from mainstream coverage to underground analysis, letting you compare narratives, spot bias, and dig deeper into the facts.
It’s a place for curious thinkers, not echo chambers. Whether you lean left, right, or somewhere off the map entirely, the idea is to expose yourself to other viewpoints and sharpen your own thinking.
Civil discussion is encouraged, and the focus stays on good information and mutual respect—not name-calling or tribal politics.
sh.itjust.works
view the rest of the comments
Who is getting the wealth becomes the issue. The vague sense that "America" gets the wealth ignores what we've already seen companies do: instead of reinvesting in the company, instead of raising wages, the major corporations aim for things like stock buybacks that boost their share prices so the board of directors are happy, the CEO keeps their job, and the leaders of the company get greater compensation as their compensation is usually in the form of stocks.
Increasing salaries is an expenditure and is often seen as a last resort. You raise salaries when you need to in order to attract new talent, or in order to retain talent. In a lot of industry the workers are no more than "meat machines" and aren't valued as a component that needs to be maintained, management would be just fine replacing them. It's the same argument with productivity, more output because a machine outputs more does not equal a greater pay for the workers, "they didn't do anything more to deserve it" so a tarrif that increases prices/profit doesn't mean that wealth will reach the general population.
"America" as in the general population loses in this scenario. Things just become more expensive, that doesn't mean that the money comes back to us. That's "trickle down economics" and we have over 50 years of evidence showing that doesn't work the way it was sold to us.