this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
71 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10296 readers
750 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'd hope this would make an impact in their reelection chances, but I don't think they were doing great with the union crowd to begin with and the Conservatives won't be very good on these issues either.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You know what might? Interfering on the side of CUPW. Fire an exec or two for blocking negotiation resolution. It's a crown corporation and they can do that as fat as I can tell. Scream from the rooftops that they've replaced them with labor friendly ones.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

But, they're NOT on the side of labour. They're on the side of CHEAP labour. If anything, they are in opposition to labour interests.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

For sure. I'm saying in case they decide to switch sides, or at least appear to for a bit.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago

The ambitions and interests of Trudeau might (for the sake of argument) be, "do whatever it takes to stay in office," but the interests of the people who have the power to put him there are, "maximize my financial profits." He is going to be thrown under the bus exactly so that these sorts of reforms don't have to become a serious option for another ten years.

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

As much as that would be satisfying to the postal workers, I don't think it would really solve a whole lot.

I am completely against back to work legislation but I do assume that's where we're headed, I think the best case scenario there is that it's paired with the entire top level leadership being fired for letting it get to this point. General public gets their service back, cupw gets a deal sooner, and it makes the union membership at large confident that back to work legislation comes with consequences for the employer.