this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
175 points (98.3% liked)

World News

48976 readers
1888 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A German court ruled that 100-year-old former Nazi guard Gregor Formanek can stand trial for aiding 3,322 murders at Sachsenhausen concentration camp (1943–1945).

The decision overturns a lower court's ruling that deemed Formanek unfit for trial due to insufficient psychiatric evaluation.

Germany has intensified efforts to prosecute remaining Nazi war criminals since a 2011 precedent allowed convictions without proof of direct killings.

Time is critical, as many suspects have died or become unfit for trial, leaving historical accountability as an urgent priority.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

It’s good that this is happening. However, my question is; how much of an impact will this have on said people?

Most of them are at such an age that they’re closely to passing/ dying away.

I’m really curious about their life after the events of WW2. Did they change or not? Did they manage to escape and life their “good” life with or without remorse? So many questions.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The purpose of penal rulings is to dissuade repeats of those actions, as other know they can be held accountable. It's still a good precident to go after them. Sure, they won't suffer much, but it shows to others who may want to follow in their footsteps that we will try to punish them if we can. If a new fascist group rises that wants to do the same thing, people will have to consider that, if they fail, they will be held accountable.

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

The problem is nobody who expects to fail will go trhough it in the first place - that's why penal rulings never work to prevent future crime. The only way to prevent future crime is to fix their causes.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago

Impact is likely minimal as pretty much everyone with direct involvement is dead. As for his life after, I doubt there was much regret, prison guards weren't just randomly assigned. He actively has to choose that assignment and be approved for it.