this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
15 points (89.5% liked)

Linux and Tech News

2102 readers
1 users here now

This is where all the News about Linux and Linux adjacent things goes. We'll use some of the articles here for the show! You can watch or listen at:

You can also get involved at our forum here on Lemmy:

Or just get the most recent episode of the show here:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] whithom@discuss.online 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Linux mint is still probably the best option for new users who don’t want to use a command line.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think Fedora is, GNOME is a much more intuitive and attractive DE to new Linux users than KDE Plasma, and GNOME Software is very simple to get started with for people that aren't very tech literate.

[–] whithom@discuss.online 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Cinnamon, I would argue, is better than gnome (for new users). And while I wouldn’t suggest mint for the long haul because it doesn’t plan to implement Wayland for a while, it’s still the fastest and most compatible one out of the box

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I haven't actually used Cinnamon, what's so great about it for new users?

[–] whithom@discuss.online 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It’s very fast on older hardware. Leaves out a lot of the modern transitions. Very simple start menu style browsing. Minimal customization options. And mint itself is very stable and comes with a good set of default software. Almost no command line needed

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't have modern transitions? I know some people that would get a bad impression of Linux in general if the DE you gave them to use didn't look modern, but I'm sure it will work well for some people, and older hardware.

[–] whithom@discuss.online 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well, it’s best for older hardware. I think a laggy experience is worse than a fast one with a simple DE

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I agree with you for older hardware, speed and performance trumps modernity and fancy graphics.

[–] whithom@discuss.online 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you like gnome though, for newer hardware, you should keep an eye on COSMIC. It’s gnome-like, and has the potential to beat it.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It does look very similar to GNOME. What do you like about it that you prefer to GNOME?

[–] whithom@discuss.online 2 points 8 months ago

Well, I like gnome a lot. However, COSMIC’s ability to color windows is better imo. It has a different control/settings app. And everything, so far, feels built in. Not just packaging it with an existing app.

It’s made with rust, so it’s theoretically faster. It’s NEW and doesn’t have legacy requirements.

However, its ability to customize is not as great as gnome… for ME, that’s a plus. I want something that keeps a consistent look and feel. I don’t need to (forgive the phrase) “rice” my DE.

It’s still in alpha, but you can get a pop_os! ISO with it and run it in a VM to check it out.