this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
89 points (96.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7192 readers
1 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/22241305

Jessica Corbett
Nov 06, 2024

"While the Democratic leadership defends the status quo, the American people are angry and want change," said the Vermont Independent. "And they're right."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Sanders will say It's OK to Be Angry About Capitalism, and he’ll rail about “oligarchs” and “crony capitalism” and “über capitalism”, but in the end he’ll always be a liberal, so he’ll never attack capitalism as-such, and he’ll never call for abolishing private ownership of the means of production, no matter how many times he purports to be a socialist.

[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Bruh... Can we fucking start with universal health or some other more basic shit?

DNC cant even be bothered to campaign on bread and butter "liberal" positions.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago

The last ~45 years of grinding neoliberalism shows me little reason to believe that we can.

The US has never been and will never be a democracy, because it was born of a bourgeois revolution[1]. The wealthy, white, male, land-owning, largely slave-owning Founding Fathers constructed a bourgeois state with “checks and balances” against the “tyranny of the majority”. It was never meant to represent the majority—the working class—and it never has, despite eventually allowing women and non-whites (at least those not disenfranchised by the carceral system) to vote. [Princeton & Northwestern] Study: US is an oligarchy, not a democracy

The US working class got some temporary gains in the 20th century (and I could describe the extraordinary—unique, really—causes of them), but those are very unlikely to ever fully return under capitalism.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)