this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
606 points (95.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

4287 readers
52 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
PugJesus@lemmy.world
PugJesus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
606
Considering last night's results, I don't expect NATO to be credible 4 years from now (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works to c/noncredibledefense@lemmy.world
265 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] perspectiveshifting@sh.itjust.works 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What lesson exactly? That if the ideal candidate isn't run, a subset of liberals will pick the worse of two options?

All that does is teach the conservatives that if they can convince you that the democrat candidate fails you enough on a single issue, they effectively have your vote. Regardless of the conservative candidate's stance on that issue.

You have made the choice to make the problem you care about profoundly worse because there wasn't a way to make it completely better. Have fun watching that play out as you intended I guess.