this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
22 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

3249 readers
275 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Itanium was an interesting architecture but it relied on compilers to build efficient code for it's bundles. This compares to x86 which dedicates loads of silicon to getting the best performance even out of mediocre code. Unfortunately the Itanic architecture was really ill suited to emulating the other.

ETA: rm dups.

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It dedicates dedicated silicon?

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

All the cache and prediction logic which eventually gave us spectre is basically compensating for whatever crap random compilers kick out.

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I was only making a joke, and not asking for clarification. Do you not see the redundancy of saying "dedicates dedicated"? I thought my reply would have made it obvious.