Futurology

3156 readers

18 users here now

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

submitted 10 months ago by Lugh@futurology.today to c/futurology@futurology.today

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Lugh@futurology.today 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Surely highlighting 5 million out of 24 million is more efficient than checking them all?

[–] knightly@pawb.social 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If you don't care about false negatives, maybe.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There are only so many historical synonyms for black people, racist language should be searchable with few false negatives

[–] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 10 months ago

No "AI" required~

[–] Lugh@futurology.today 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

false negatives

I don't get your logic here either. A false negative would have zero implications for anyone. It would have no legal standing or relevance.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 4 points 10 months ago

A false negative would have zero implications for anyone. It would have no legal standing or relevance.

I don't understand, in what way does allowing a racist deed covenant stand unchallenged have zero implications or relevance?

If it did, then what would be the point of rooting them out in the first place?