this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
191 points (98.0% liked)

CLOSED

295 readers
1 users here now

CLOSED

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] errer@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I’m aware. The point is whoever wrote the article may have seen “39 years old” and interpreted that as either 1985 or 1986.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

seems like they just tapped the wrong number, they replied with "oops".