this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
191 points (98.0% liked)
CLOSED
295 readers
1 users here now
CLOSED
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I’m aware. The point is whoever wrote the article may have seen “39 years old” and interpreted that as either 1985 or 1986.
seems like they just tapped the wrong number, they replied with "oops".