News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
So what? If they don't give it back, they owe $400.
Bullshit. Neither the local ISP I am using now nor shitty Spectrum when I had it charged me a dime. When we switched to the local ISP, Spectrum just wanted it back. The local ISP has a hell of a lot less money than any company Musk owns, and yet they can somehow handle giving out their equipment to tens of thousands of customers for free until they are returned.
SpaceX isn't selling the dishes at a loss anymore. That was a a generation or 2 ago. I don't know if they make a profit or they've just met costs though.
And yet companies like Comcast charge $5+ per month to rent their shitty modem, and will even charge customers who never had a rental modem at all. Your area isn't indicative of the entire country.
Spectrum literally serves the entire country.
If Spectrum can do it, so can Musk.
I'm just astounded you are defending marketing this deceptive.
"Free as long as you don't count the $400 initial cost and also you will be forced to pay $120 a month if you forget to go through all the hoops we will force you to go through in order to cancel in 30 days" is not the charitable donation you seem to think it is.
I never claimed it was a charitable donation.
I'm not defending anything. The "marketing" is not deceptive. Starlink said they would provide free service... And that's what they're doing.
Everyone else is assuming that would include other shit like free hardware that Starlink never claimed and has never offered free previously. There is absolutely zero reason to expect free hardware here, yet that seems to be what you all are expecting for some reason.
Dude, you're talking about a standard ISP offer. It is not any more a "free service" than any other ISP giving you one moth without paying a monthly fee. This does nothing to help hurricane victims despite it being pushed that way.
Seriously, is the whole concept of "the first month is free if you sign up" new to you?
Your right, except Starlink doesn't offer free service to new customers normally.
So it is something special they don't normally do.
So... a "special offer to new customers?"
Again, a very common thing that businesses do all the time regardless of a hurricane.
A "very common thing" that Starlink does not do.
You're angry about a company offering something in the hurricane affected area that they don't normally do with regular customers.
It doesn't matter if other companies offer something similar normally to new customers, Starlink does not do this, so it is a special thing for the Hurricane areas.
Not sure why this is so hard for you to understand here, other than a blinding bias.
Ah, I see, out of the kindness of their heart, Starlink is having an unprecedented one-month-free sale for new customers surviving a hurricane, something many, many, many companies do all the time when there isn't a hurricane, but they don't usually do.
And I'm angry that is being hailed as some sort of helpful or even heroic gesture on their part rather than, you know, a limited-time sale.
That's marketing being reported as fact. They're having a sale, that's all that's happening. Stop suggesting there's anything more to it than that just because they want you to think it.
Why cant you understand that elon musk is a generous angel who is trying to cash in on peoples fema checks?
/s