Formula 1

10383 readers

51 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series

2025 Calendar

Location	Date
🇦🇿 Azerbaijan	19-21 Sep
🇸🇬 Singapore	03-05 Oct
🇺🇸 United States	17-19 Oct
🇲🇽 Mexico	24-26 Oct
🇧🇷 Brazil	07-09 Nov
🇺🇸 United States	20-22 Nov
🇶🇦 Qatar	28-30 Nov
🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi	05-07 Dec

Rules

Be respectful to everyone: drivers, lemmings etc
No gambling, crypto or NFTs
Spoilers are allowed
Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.
No duplicate posts, or posts of different news companies that say the same thing.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Photographer@lemmy.world

wes@lemmy.world

bwoah@lemmy.world

Otmar Szafnauer blames 'untrustworthy' Alpine for Oscar Piastri F1 dispute - Motorsport Week (www.motorsportweek.com)

submitted 11 months ago by GreenEngineering3475@lemmy.world to c/formula1@lemmy.world

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Otmar Szafnauer has blamed "untrustworthy" individuals within Alpine's F1 team over the contract ordeal which saw Oscar Piastri go to McLaren.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kata1yst@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

“We absolutely did everything that was meant to be done by that contract that was never signed.

“In English law, had we taken it to an English court, maybe we would have won.

“You know, that’s unjust enrichment. ‘You know, you didn’t sign the contract, but you took all this and you’re not delivering what you’re supposed to deliver.”

Pretty fucking rich. Piastri didn't make Alpine not sign. And if they actually had their shit together they could have chosen not to give him the benefits without an unsigned contact, but instead they acted like it was signed and expected to still get the benefits?

How the fuck do they think they could have won the case? Like, if I offered a contact to Alpine that I would shit in front of their office and they would let me drive a season in F1, and then they didn't sign, could I bring them to court after I shat on the sidewalk and demand they let me drive? Bonkers.

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

Othmar is talking about implied acceptance of a contract.

Implied acceptance is when a person's actions indicate that they agree to the terms of an offer, even if they don't explicitly say so. This creates a binding contract between the parties involved.

Basically, if the contract says that I will have to give you support and in turn you will be bound to my academy, and then I give you that support, I have indicated that I agree to the terms of that contract. Even if my legal department messes up signing it.

Of course, Alpine never tested whether that line would hold in court, and therefore it's eeh.

[–] FrostyTrichs@walledgarden.xyz 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Pretty fucking rich. Piastri didn't make Alpine not sign. And if they actually had their shit together they could have chosen not to give him the benefits without an unsigned contact, but instead they acted like it was signed and expected to still get the benefits?

How the fuck do they think they could have won the case? Like, if I offered a contact to Alpine that I would shit in front of their office and they would let me drive a season in F1, and then they didn't sign, could I bring them to court after I shat on the sidewalk and demand they let me drive? Bonkers.

It sounds more like he's bitter that they didn't get Oscar, and the fallout from that was almost certainly factored into his job loss.

Edited to fix markup