this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
52 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

73792 readers
2992 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
52
Weekly tech discussion and tech support thread (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by PopBobert@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hey everybody, feel free to post any tech support or general tech discussion questions you have right here.

As always, be excellent to each other.

Yours truly, moderators.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PopBobert@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

RAM can serve up data in memory 1000 times faster than a NVMe drive

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 2 years ago

Also RAM doesn't have a limited number of lifetime writes.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, I get that. But I'm really wondering why that is? If memory is digital, and storage is digital, why not develop a RAM-less architecture? Why not have a storage bus with the same throughput as memory does currently? Is it just because of the cost of the chips?