this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
171 points (100.0% liked)

Antiwork

8259 readers
1 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 111 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The unannounced inspection visits by top managers were obviously not well received. “You could just tell by the aggression,” Demmler continues. “By having the door slammed shut. By being threatened with the police. By being asked if you don’t have to make an appointment first.”

Jesus christ imagine being this oblivious.

"We harassed workers outside of their work hours and they were mean!"

There will be a lawsuit and it will be hilarious to anyone with the vaguest concept of workers rights

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I'm mildly shocked nobody was shot over it. Sick people aren't generally in the clearest state of mind, pissing them off would make things worse

[–] officermike@lemmy.world 48 points 10 months ago (4 children)

It's Germany. On paper, only 1 in 60 people there own a firearm.

[–] Sailing7@lemmy.ml 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Ohhh shit. Those managers are in for a good time.

Workes court will pull them in little pieces. This shit is so fucking illegal in germany.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The article says it's not illegal? Would hope to fuck there are some basic boundaries by law.

[–] menemen@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think they framed it as "get well" visits. I think "control visits" without plausible suspicion of fraud would be illegal. There are procedures to do this in Germany.

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

If what the article quotes for the CEO and CHRO are accurate those dispel any of that defense I'd think.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

In most parts of the world people don't sit in their houses with guns fantasizing about murdering people.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 months ago

That would definitely explain it lol

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 3 points 10 months ago

I'd consider getting one if that was something my employer did.