this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
926 points (97.8% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !historymemes@piefed.social

3477 readers
1 users here now

THIS COMM HAS MOVED

!historymemes@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I remember reading somewhere that upon liberation from concentration camps, many gay individuals were simply transferred to prisons from their home country for the crime of being gay. The Nazis were terrifyingly effective in branding exactly what kind of "undesirable" you were:

Image source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_concentration_camp_badge

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

im sorry asocial? What the fuck does this mean in the context of the nazis? Were people who didn't actively socialize considered a threat somehow?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Asocial was a very broad term - anyone they thought was not sufficiently contributing to society, essentially.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

ok so basically "slackers" were considered to be asocial and then stuffed into the gulags, fascinating.

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

yes, Remember Nazi rhetoric didn't hate the Polish, the Jewish, the Communist etc... without having an easily agreed upon base of reasons as to why you should hate them. why do you think people have called Republican rhetoric genocidal? because they are further along to the "justifying the camps" than many people realize, they know the Nazis did bad things, but very few people know what led up to and allowed the Nazis to do those bad things.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

yeah, current republican sentiment is problematic. It's an interesting and really hard problem to deal with, for multiple reasons. Because on one hand it's a frogs in a boiling pot problem, but on the other it's also really hard to do anything about because they just reverse anything you throw at them, and pretend you're the one being the nazi, not them.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

but on the other it’s also really hard to do anything about because they just reverse anything you throw at them, and pretend you’re the one being the nazi, not them.

Also an old Nazi tactic.

"Mean old Weimar Republic, muzzling our holsum leader, don't they believe in freeze peach???"

And the Weimar Republic gave in, like the spineless fucks they were.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

can we just start referring to this shit as "hitlerisms" to start making a more dramatic point? Or would that be bad?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A more general "Fascist shite" might be more appropriate. Hitlerisms sounds like a verbal tic of Hitler or something, lol

maybe, but i think a hitlerism would be a very funny and silly thing to point out, though maybe that in it of itself is problematic lol.