this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
877 points (97.7% liked)

News

35749 readers
2278 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

JD Vance was roundly mocked online over a trip to the supermarket where he bemoaned the steep price of eggs — and botched the photo opp.

The Republican vice presidential nominee stopped by a supermarket in Reading, Pennsylvania, with his sons over the weekend to illustrate how grocery prices have been impacted by “Kamala Harris’s policies” when he claimed a dozen eggs cost $4.

The problem? When footage of the visit emerged, Vance was quickly called out by viewers who spotted the price tag of a dozen eggs behind him was actually $2.99.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Do we know that's actually the reason the prices doubled (and is jt still a valid reason)? Or is it mostly just unchecked gouging like almost all other groceries?

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago

First one, then the other, and that's why Kroger is getting their asses sued off by the FTC under Biden appointee Lina Khan. The avian flu issue was a legitimate supply/demand squeeze for a little while, until it wasn't, and Kroger didn't back down an inch, so the FTC is stepping in.

[–] jonne 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's probably both. You find an excuse to raise prices, you build in some extra margin so you only have to raise the price in one big go instead of smaller increments that better reflect market prices. Your competitors do the same, and you just tell everyone there's nothing you can do, it's just inflation.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds reasonable, I was asking if we have actual data instead of Feels.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's been a couple studies. This NYT article summarizes some of them. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/15/business/economy/kamala-harris-inflation-price-gouging.html

The article says that the cause is complex. Corporate profits are part of it, but also increased wages across the supply chain, and strong demand (more people eating at home instead of eating out) vs lower supply (egg shortages, for example). I saw another article suggesting that climate change was also harshly impacting the supply chain, but it didn't list a solid source.

[–] Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've never understood the "more people eating at home" argument for hight food prices. The same amount of food is being bought even if a restaurant is buying less. Like food magically doesn't get eaten or needed more based on people eating at home or eating out. The food would just be going to the grocer instead the restaurant directly. Or am I misunderstanding this?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IIRC, one of the lessons from the pandemic is that restaurant and grocery store food chains are separate things. It isn't easy to switch between them.

Logistics is boring, but really important.

[–] Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

That makes some sense but it sounds like a problem for the companies to solve logistically and not just burden on the household buyer as a bandage.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

No they build in extra margin so they make more profit.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

That's a great point, I'm not sure.

Either way though, it has nothing to do with top level leadership. It's either something the FTC needs to take care of (price gouging) or the USDA (avian flu).

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

OK, is it both?

I'm asking what data shows is actually true in this case.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don’t know that anyone has traced that out but there were articles predicting this some months ago.