this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
348 points (98.6% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !historyphotos@piefed.social

7391 readers
1 users here now

COMM MOVED TO !historyphotos@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] metaStatic@kbin.earth 108 points 1 year ago (3 children)

dudes about to fall over that hydrant

[โ€“] ladicius@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyones first thought at this picture ๐Ÿ˜‚

Maybe staged for this purpose?

[โ€“] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wouldn't a camera in those days need a long exposure to get such a sharp picture with them moving?

[โ€“] PugJesus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

By '37? No, you had cameras that could take pretty sharp images in a (ha) snap. Even some expensive consumer cameras could get damn fine shots. Late 19th century is when you have the dying days of long exposure - except for color photography, which generally did require a little time spent stationary until like, the 50s or something.

[โ€“] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 5 points 1 year ago

The trendsetting first portable, compact Leica came out in '25^[1]

[โ€“] bitwaba@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

He's about to get the horny bonk when he face plants into the concrete.

[โ€“] makyo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

No way that's the classic 'pretend you're smoking or otherwise disinterested and subtly twist' move implemented by planting a pivot foot and then stepping back to cautiously turn your body