this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
2 points (75.0% liked)

Apple

111 readers
1 users here now

A place for Apple news, rumors, and discussions.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I still don't think USB-C is a viable replacement for USB-A for lots of uses, it's just so fragile. I have so many messed up usb c things and I can't remember ever damaging a usb a connector in a way that mattered.

[–] teft@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The cables are more fragile on USB C in order to save the ports. The opposite was true for USB A. Basically if something hits an A connector the cable was sturdy enough to transfer the force to the port and damage it. With C you just have to replace the cable.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you sure? Because I have a couple of older phones that were USB-C and their port was the first thing to fail...

[–] teft@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I can’t speak to every manufacturer but that is part of the logic of the redesign i remember reading about.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)