this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
166 points (97.7% liked)

Transgender

894 readers
11 users here now

Overview:

The Lemmy place to discuss the news and experiences of transgender people.


Rules:

  1. Keep discussions civil.

  2. Arguments against transgender rights will be removed.

  3. No bigotry is allowed - including transphobia, homophobia, speciesism, racism, sexism, classism, ableism, castism, or xenophobia.

Shinigami Eyes:

Extension for Quickly Spotting Transphobes Online.

Shinigami Eyes

spoiler iphone: unofficial workaround to use extension Install the Orion browser then add the extension. :::

Related:!lgbtq_plus@lemmy.blahaj.zone

!intersex@lemmy.blahaj.zone


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

One step closer to pregnant men, then the smoothbrained bigots will REALLY be digging for reasons. (I don't mean the obvious, but like in Junior, the movie)

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Pregnant men aren't the point here. They exist and have an emoji 🫃 already but frankly, FtM people are unlikely to want to get pregnant anyway, it's undoubtedly feminine and will likely require steps back in hormonal therapy to reduce risk.

The real LGBT winners here would be MtF transgenders who could finally do another thing previously only available to people born with female reproductive organs.

I like inclusivity IRL and I'm happy with Unicode's support for ancient/artificial languages but frankly, the variations per emoji are pushing my comfort zone. Gendered language is thankfully on its way out, why all the separate emoji then? Most don't warrant gendered versions imo because there is not much difference between them anyway. I'd prefer silhouette or yellow presentations in line with faces like 😀 and pictograms like 🫂🗣️ (plus lots of non-emoji ones). Yes, there should be a male and female face and body, skirt dancer and a tuxedo one, same with wedding attire and perhaps breastfeeding/bottle feeding, but just a gender and skin tone neutral variation for actions 🙌💁💇🚶🧑‍🦽🤳🧏🤷🧑‍💻🕵️🦸 is enough. In reality, there isn't a gendered 👶 baby, 🤠 cowboy or ⛷️ skier, either, so consistency would actually improve. With all the variations, too much effort is being put into tiny, text-accompanying pictures that are supposed to represent a simple idea.

Edit: added bold sentence

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I was saying it should happen to troll the bigots, not as some idea that the future requires gender.

[–] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org 3 points 11 months ago

The last paragraph is just my own rambling about Unicode. It was me who brought emoji into this.

[–] alx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Men can already get pregnant.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

I specifically cited Junior as an example of what I meant, don't be a "well aktually" dumbass.