this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
106 points (99.1% liked)

PC Gaming

12281 readers
491 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s objectively worse. “Real world performance” might be the same, but I’m paying for performance AND parts.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're not paying for the discrete parts. You're not gonna desolder that RAM and use it for something else.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No but I am paying for the accumulation of those parts no? Otherwise I’m not buying hardware.

And we know shoe on the other foot, if there was no performance increase, but a fancy marketing label, they’d be all over increasing the price for it.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're paying for the overall performance of the product, not for specs of each discrete component by itself.

Yes, you also pay for whatever they decide is relevant to marketing.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

How is buying hardware based on specs not doing both?

To that end, that’s like saying apple doesn’t need to offer higher base specs on things like ssds and internal storage because the performance is the same.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Correct, there would be no reason for them to purposefully overspec their parts.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So then why wouldn’t I expect a discount on this v2 card?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because you're paying for the card as a whole, not discrete components.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, you're not purchasing discrete components for use as discrete components.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If im not buying the cumulation of parts I don’t know what im buying.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You don't understand how the overall system as a whole differs from the discrete components in isolation?

No…

You can’t buy a card without also buying all the individual composts though.

Except I’m buying a card with objectively worse materials.