this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
69 points (97.3% liked)

World News

49296 readers
2585 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

You really didn't read the article.

UNICEF is ready to buy and ship the vaccines but

Three years after the last worldwide mpox outbreak, the W.H.O. still has neither officially approved the vaccines — although the United States and Europe have — nor has it issued an emergency use license that would speed access.

And the W.H.O. decided not to issue an emergency license back then because it wanted to ensure that research data was generated, he said. Authorizing widespread use would have cost researchers that essential opportunity.

The article is worth reading. It's critical of the WHO but does include that organization's point of view. My TLDR would be that regulators are much more concerned about approving a treatment that harms people than they are about doing nothing and passively allowing people to be harmed.

[–] Thrashy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Somewhere a philosophy undergrad just sat bolt upright and shouted, "A TROLLEY PROBLEM! I must go, the world needs me!"

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is a little more complicated than the trolley problem because pulling the lever doesn't cause the train to kill one person instead of five. It causes the train to go onto a completely empty track where it won't hit anyone, but there's a small chance that changing the train's direction will cause it to derail and crash into a crowd of people, killing many more than five of them.

If derailing kills 50 people and the chance of derailing is 1 in 100, the average number of deaths from pulling the lever is only 0.5. But you're going to be pulling the lever a lot, eventually one of the trains will derail, and when 50 people die do you want to be the guy explaining that the expected value of your action was positive?

What if you're really unlucky and the train derails the first time you pull the lever? Then you can't even point out that pulling the lever in the past saved lives.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

, as well as data from studies carried out once the vaccine was deployed during the 2022 mpox outbreak. More than 1.2 million people in the United States received at least one dose of the vaccine at that time, and studies showed it provided a high level of protection against mpox.

Yet the W.H.O. did not open formal consideration of that research until last week.

Deusdedit Mubangizi, the W.H.O.’s director of health product policy and standards, said that the organization’s group of experts would meet the week of Sept. 16 to consider the submitted data, and could issue a license as early as that week if they were satisfied.

I stand by my assessment

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Deusdedit Mubangizi isn't exactly a white guy.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev -1 points 1 year ago

I wonder what the racial makeup of that group of experts is, or how they would react if the virus was spreading in a community that included their families. Or what is the racial makeup of the people funding this whole organization and deciding what is and isn't some kind of "quicker than 2 years timeframe" emergency situation.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's some weird history or something where Africans supposedly received bad medications or something to do with sterilization I think...

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

African countries have been deliberately sold dangerously defective medical products in the past (although not by UNICEF, as far as I know) and of course that was wrong, but if for that reason the WHO decides not to approve this vaccine, it doesn't make sense to blame present-day UNICEF. They can't change the past; they can only offer medication now.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It seems like they are erring on the side of caution to the max because it only takes one catastrophic responder for a massive medical/political/pr shit storm, given that history. There are always grifters and crisis actors waiting for their next venture

Doesn't help that a lot of these things are damned if you do, not damned if you don't. The incentive is just not there to take that kind of risk. There will always be unintended consequences when these solutions are imposed or offered from outside