this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
219 points (96.2% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

4905 readers
328 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 62 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Within a year of the decision Texas implemented discrimatory voting laws, proving that the federal oversight really was necessary.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Which was obvious to everyone but those paid not to see it

Truth is denied those who seek it with both eyes closed.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What was the content of the discriminatory voting laws?

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

https://apnews.com/article/voting-rights-act-supreme-court-black-voters-6f840911e360c44fd2e4947cc743baa2

Within hours of a U.S. Supreme Court decision dismantling a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, Texas lawmakers announced plans to implement a strict voter ID law that had been blocked by a federal court. Lawmakers in Alabama said they would press forward with a similar law that had been on hold.

Voter ID laws for voting are discriminatory in practice in the US, especially in southern states for a mulitide of reasons including barriers to getting the IDs, easily losing them due to discriminatory law enforcement, and many minorities not getting them for other reasons.

[–] 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 8 months ago

My northern state has required id to vote for a long time. If you don't have a driver license, you can get a non-driver id for free so you can vote.