this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
196 points (100.0% liked)

News

36993 readers
1491 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. Postal Service on Thursday said it needs to shave more costs from its operations to get into better financial shape. To do that, the postal agency wants to overhaul its delivery logistics, resulting in some customers likely seeing a slowdown in their mail delivery.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 176 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

The 👏 USPS 👏 is 👏 a 👏 government 👏 service and does not need to be "profitable". You don't hear people complaining that the military "loses" $700B a year.*

I know DeJoy can't just be fired, but I really wish there were some progress toward ousting him.

* Aside from the valid complaints about military spending in general. Also the $700B figure is likely out of date.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

A great deal of the financial pressure that the USPS has been under resulted from the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act [which] required the Postal Service to create a $72 billion fund that would pay for its employees’ retirement health benefits for more than 50 years into the future

The system is absurd and intentionally so. The goal of this system is to starve the USPS of spendable cash in a quixotic effort to save money for employees who haven't been born yet.

I know DeJoy can’t just be fired

Biden has the power to fire and replace the entire USPS Board of Governors. The replacements then have the power to replace DeJoy.

But in much the same way Biden refuses to pack the SCOTUS (a nine seat bench that presides over thirteen appellate courts and should have been expanded decades ago), he's dragging his heels on a Board of Governors long ago stacked with Republican nominees. This is because Biden fucking voted for this policy. One of the worst bills in US History was passed through the Senate with unanimous consent.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Decorum strikes again!

(Am I ever tired of the government being run by people who do what they do because that's the way they've always done it. No more greatests/silents/boomers who have been in government for 20, 30, 40, 50 years please.)

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

"Decorum," or just Democrats not actually being the allies to normal people that people want them to be.

(To be clear: that's still way better than the Republicans' outright mustache-twirling villainy.)

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lol, yeah. $700B was just the last figure I recalled clearly but was pretty sure it had increased.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

It always increases, sigh...

[–] Sumocat@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The key difference is the USPS is self-funded, so it does need to cover costs and maintain a reserve to cover downturns, which it could do by expanding into basic banking services, like check cashing, if DeJoy was not tasked with grinding the service down.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Tasked? DeJoy owns a freight company, breaking and outsourcing USPS is in his financial interest

[–] LemmyFeed@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Ugh does he really?

[–] Sumocat@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He didn’t appoint himself to the job.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 2 points 2 years ago

No he was just appointed by a fascist to dismantle the USPS to try and block mail in votes

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

so it does need to cover costs

What about that determination isn't 100% arbitrary?

[–] Sumocat@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago

Do you think postal carriers work for free? Salaries, vehicle maintenance, keeping the lights on, etc, these are all real expenses.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 13 points 2 years ago

700 billion is just the figure that we get to know about

Maybe if they would take that 700 billion and invest it in an interest-bearing way, They would be able to pay for them selves.

[–] mystik@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

The hold up is that the new appointees Biden picked also support DeJoy, because Biden doesn't actually oppose DeJoy's destruction of USPS.