this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
816 points (97.8% liked)

Fediverse

36098 readers
58 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Probably better to post in the github issue rather than replying here.

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/4967

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] drasglaf@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

If your privacy is at risk in a place like Lemmy, you might be giving up too much private information IMHO.

[–] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Sure sounds like a lot of victim blaming to me. If someone upvoted a post in their city's regional instance but never commented, it's insane to me that a) that vote should be publicly viewable and b) people would blame the user.

[–] drasglaf@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

That's a fair point, but I still think it's a very specific case. I believe it would benefit way more than harm the fediverse in general.

Like others have said, maybe do it opt-in, so each instance can choose whether they want to have it or not.

[–] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Opt in would be far more of a reasonable option .

[–] drasglaf@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

The problem I see with that is, bad actors only need to make accounts in instances that opted out to keep doing their thing. But yes, I think they'll choose this option in the end.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)