this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
19 points (95.2% liked)

AskHistorians

1122 readers
15 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He still idolised hitler for much of his career, was extremely racist and antisemetic, and contributed wholeheartedly to the german war effort. Although you are right, he wasn’t genocidal, and late in the war he became disenchanted with Hitler. He was one of the better Nazis, and wouldn’t have been hanged, but he was still awful. I’m very uncomfortable with the fact many schools and streets are named after him in germany, and that he has a couple monuments.

[–] Cagi@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Oh yes, there's so much myth surrounding him, most of which is pure propaganda. But he would not have been executed. The allies had a lot of respect for him, much of the modern myth is rooted in Allied discussions about Rommel. Between that and Nazi propaganda, his image is much cleaner than reality, which unfortunately remains ambiguous. He doesn't deserve the veneration he receives but it'd be hugely enlightening to hear his post war break down. Even liars like Speer still provided valuable insights in their post war comments.