this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
729 points (100.0% liked)

196

18188 readers
333 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 114 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

It’s an attempt to create a unified narrative that can tie together a number of disparate groups. Groups who have no chance of winning elections or joining another coalition. Groups whose goals and ambitions are so antithetical to public interest that they can never actually say what they want out loud.

The reason this document is so bizarre and unhinged is because it’s trying to speak the language of people who have to speak in a series of dog whistles to prevent being disregarded out of hand.

It’s a rallying cry to all those who are upset when they get held accountable for saying what they actually think.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I never put it together like that. Thank you. It all makes so much more sense now.

@undergroundoverground, next to you in this thread, also goes into how they cannot actually define anything as simple as "anti-woke". The rhetoric falls back to meaningless marketing-like-words (e.g. "common sense") that are, perhaps deliberately, open to personal interpretation. The only coherent platform is the one that exists in an individual's head, yet it is distinct from the next guy.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I, a non-violent person, really wish a nose-punch on anyone who uses the phrase common sense to bolster their position.

I feel bad for it, but I also really disdain the notion of common sense. It's common sense to stand loyal to your rapist buddy. It's common sense to throw rocks at people who speak with different dialects or worship strange gods.

We traded up common sense for deliberation and rationality when we tried agriculture so we didn't have to migrate so much.

[–] androogee@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

I always think of "common" sense in the same aspect as a common trading card.

Not exactly something to brag about, I'm on the lookout for some rare or legendary sense. Haha.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)