this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
50 points (93.1% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

2077 readers
83 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

❶ Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

❷ Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

❸ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

❹ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

❺ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

❻ Don't be a dick.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

But it still works on Firefox.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] schwim@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Why are uBlock users even on Chrome? The two are completely opposed to each other philosophically.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's not necessarily straightforward to run Firefox on a Chromebook.

[–] schwim@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Your point is taken but It would again beg the question why someone that wanted to block ads would buy a device designed by an ad company.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Because I needed a machine that could run my college's anti-cheat spyware, and Windows or Mac were even worse (more proprietary) options.

Besides, I'm pretty sure it's old enough that "manifest v3" wasn't a thing yet, so how was I supposed to know it was gonna be a problem?

load more comments (4 replies)