Data Is Beautiful

6847 readers

1 users here now

A place to share and discuss data visualizations. #dataviz

(under new moderation as of 2024-01, please let me know if there are any changes you want to see!)

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

satur@lemmy.ml

otter@lemmy.ca

465

Presidential election popular vote tallies lined up against “did not vote” (mbin.grits.dev)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by mozz@mbin.grits.dev to c/dataisbeautiful@lemmy.ml

94 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] rarWars@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The percentages for 2016 only add up to 97, and the 40% bar is longer than the 41% of 2012.

[–] Klaymore@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Maybe 3% voted for a third party, and because they aren't shown the other bars were expanded to fill the entire space

[–] rarWars@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They could've done a little green sliver like they did for 1980.

[–] Mojave@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Looks like '95 has 5% third party votes. The lower bound for visually representing votes here may be somewhere between 5% and 3% for the purposes of this graphic

[–] FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Just like the sub on reddit, the data in DataIsBeautiful apparently doesn't actually have to be beautiful.

[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, sometimes it say "won" or lost" behind the candidates, sometimes there is an asterisk, but for many entries, there is no information who won and who lost?

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 3 points 1 year ago

The asterisk is explained up top, and they only indicate who won when it is backwards from the popular vote total.