this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
129 points (93.3% liked)

Technology

74663 readers
2358 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
129
Major shifts at OpenAI spark skepticism about impending AGI timelines (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago by some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
84 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's already fact that the Turing Test only determines how much it can simulate human behavior. Nothing with intelligence to do.

[โ€“] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly. You could ask a human a lot of questions and make an "AI" that literally just looks up answers to common questions and have it pass the Turing test, provided the pre-answered questions cover what the human proctoring the "test" asks.

If we take it a step further and ask, why can't an LLM be "conscious," there's a lot of studies by experts that explain that. So I'll refer OP there.