science

21532 readers

284 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

m3t00@lemmy.world

Joleee@lemmy.world

laverabe@lemmy.world

DeadPand@midwest.social

laverabe@lemmy.zip

109

Is there a scientific calendar which uses a different reference than Jesus? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by stardustpathsofglory@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world

90 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I hope questions are allowed here. I am curios if there is a different sort of scientific calendar which does not use the birth of Jesus as a reference like AD and BC. For example Kurzgesagt's calendars use the the current year plus 10000 as this represents the human better or something like that.

Would there be a way to do this more accurately? How could we, in a scientific correct way, define a reference from where we are counting years?

Also I have read about the idea of having 13 months instead of 12 would be "nice" because then we could have a even distributed amount of days per month.

Are there already ideas for this? What would you recommend to read?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Birth of Jesus isn't even accurate. Best guess is that, if it happened at all, which is up for debate, it was around 4 BC.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'm always intrigued by this sort of hypothesis, can you recommend a good link to an alternative explanation for the early church?

Like I get that early Christians worked in a lot (LOT) of existing mythology to make Christianity palatable/ relatable to various local groups. But where could the early Christians have come from if not a Jesus like figure?

load more comments (3 replies)