this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
326 points (98.8% liked)

Firefox

17857 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] give@phuu.uk 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (19 children)

@neme loaded questions are loaded.

The "Want most" to "Want least" scale is loaded AF.

Where is the option for "I don't want any of these things"?

Edit: Yeah, fuck that. That survey is bullshit. I stopped bothering to give answers due to the multi-choice questions seeming like a way for Mozilla to have a wank about itself.

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

This is fairly standard survey design, I believe. They're not looking to know which features are wanted in general; they want to know their relative popularity. The sets you're presented are randomised (i.e. we don't all get to see the same sets), which allows them to get a ranked list of lots of potential features, while only having to run ten survey questions per participant.

If you get a set with three features that everyone likes or dislikes at about the same level, then it doesn't really matter want you answer: they'll all end up at the top or bottom of the list, respectively. Because each of those options also get presented as part of different sets to different users, where different answers can win out.

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The problem with this design is, if people do not care, then they will give random answers, if they don't have the option to not care. Also this would be important information for Mozilla too, if many people do not care about a specific question. So I feel like they should have done that. But, who am I...

Any uncertainty would be filtered out by the scale of people answering

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)