this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
528 points (98.0% liked)

memes

16728 readers
2889 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 30p87@feddit.org 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Honestly ... I think that's a myth. I have 200+ FF Nightly tabs open, and I did have up to five tab groups with 100+ tabs each, as well as dozens of Addons, including the notoriously laggy Dark Reader, and I don't notice any slowdown I wouldn't call acceptable - just the usual suspects (Teams and google apps) are crap, but that's just incompatibility with standards on their part. And I don't have any crazy PC or something, just a pretty old 5 2600 and for the most part 16 GB Ram (which did get pretty tight with Minecraft, Idea and FF running), now 32 GB Detotaded Wam.

[–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Both Firefox (see about:unloads) & Chromium have a feature to unload old tabs when running low on memory. On session restore all tabs start unloaded

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 8 points 1 year ago

Yep. I even have an extension to manually unload tabs/tab groups. That's why I wonder why even IT people say more tabs = worse performance.

[–] Unforeseen@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't realize Dark Reader was laggy or known to be laggy but it makes sense. It doesn't matter in any case, you'd have to pry it from my cold dead eyes

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 5 points 1 year ago

Well it does alter the whole website, in consideration of other parts of the website, which means it fully parses it. Therefore a website is basically handled two or three times before it's finally displayed.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can't you just.... Close them? Why you you need 200 tabs? You do know about bookmarks right?

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bookmarks, do you have any idea how much more time it takes to delete a bookmark

[–] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a right click and delete. I keep a folder called tmp for exactly this reason. I really don't understand why people do it but man it is infuriating watching someone do it. Maybe it's a bit of ocd tendencies but I absolutely hate it.

I just shove the tabs in a seperate window and let them eat a couple gigs of RAM, webpages need a little snack sometimes.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 2 points 1 year ago

Because they're all active projects, and most of them are open "just in case I need that exact piece of information again".

only effect I have is on startup and it using a lot of memory