this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
737 points (91.1% liked)

Facepalm

3354 readers
2 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Similarly to how 'reactionary' just means 'bad' to these people. For the record a 'reactionary' is somebody who wants to restore a previous status quo. It's not inherently good or bad.

[–] frezik@midwest.social -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Reactionary, in political science terms, is the opposite of radicals. Radicals are to the left and reactionaries are to the right. In practice, people on the internet tend to use radical for both, but I wish the distinction was made more clear.

[–] denshirenji@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You are correct. Radicals want things to change in an extreme way, and reactionaries are just that, reactionary to change. Not sure why you got downvoted for knowing what you are talking about.

Language does change, though, and often laymen use words differently than subject matter experts.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

While I usually try not to be prescriptive with language, it has a place. The distinction between radical and reactionary is a useful one.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

No. Radical is simply somebody who wants to fundamentally change society. It's not the opposite of a reactionary, in fact, you can be radical and reactionary at the same time.