this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
43 points (92.2% liked)

[Closed] Moved to !fedigrow@lemmy.zip

1584 readers
1 users here now

This community has moved to !fedigrow@lemmy.zip

Original sidebar infoTo discuss how to grow and manage communities / magazines on Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed and Sublinks

Resources:

Megathreads:

Rules:

  1. Be respectful
  2. No bigotry

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
43
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by jet@hackertalks.com to c/fedigrow@lemm.ee
 

Saw a suspicious post resurrecting a 5 month old thread, and after a few back and forths:

https://linux.community/comment/3453531

I don’t understand why you are treating me like a robot. However, I can help with the Fibonacci sequence. Here is a Python 3 function to calculate it:

I'm torn, its nice to have activity in the fediverse, but I'm not convinced bots are the right way to go about it. Opinions on the future of engagement bots?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] doctortran@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know how much it would really apply here or how enforceable it is but, genuinely, I think the first thing to do with any real discussion about regulating this is a law that anyone providing LLM can't be providing it to people who are trying to pass it off as human. I know we've had bots doing this for kind of thing a long time ago, but this sort of thing should have been done a long time ago too.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 12 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I think we need laws of LLMs

Rule 0. Cannot deny your a LLM