this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
529 points (100.0% liked)

196

18162 readers
136 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 127 points 1 year ago (1 children)

monkey jpg owners in shambles

[–] 0laura@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

noone understands nfts it's insane.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 66 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it's easy to understand but also stupid

[–] 0laura@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

nft art is stupid but not for the reason most people think it is. most people don't even know that there's a difference between an nft and nft "art"

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Between 2014 & today, market appears to have determined neither are relevant. Corporations appear not to have found captivating use cases as well. Given this, is the lack of understanding to be expected?

Compare to, like, folks understanding differences between Instagram & TikTok. More people understand because it’s relevant to them, regardless of the average Lemming’s view of the platforms.

[–] KillingAndKindess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

True, but lets stop conflating the market with a wise being.

[–] 0laura@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Im not saying everyone should understand it, I just think the ratio of understanding to hatred is a bit skewed. you should at least know what something is before passionately hating it.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

oh wow an enlightened being that knows that nfts are links to monke jpegs stored in an extremely inefficient append-only database, instead of jpegs themselves. none of that shit is remotely practical unless you make some hopelessly paranoid libertarian flavoured assumptions about how world works

[–] 0laura@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

btw fun fact, all bitcoins are NFTs

[–] ColonelThirtyTwo@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think that's true. Bitcoins are fungible, NFTs aren't.

[–] 0laura@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

nope! bitcoins aren't fungible anymore. you can track all bitcoins across the entire blockchain, any bitcoins involved in illegal activity are "dirty" and not accepted by exchanges. "virgin" bitcoins are worth more than "used" bitcoins. they aren't truly fungible anymore.

[–] 0laura@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

NFTs aren't links

[–] grandma@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

NFTs are an interesting concept and I'm sure they could have some real use cases, I'm just yet to see them. Autogenerated art definitely is not one of them though.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

or you could, you know, just use normal database instead

[–] grandma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Boring and doesnt burn enough oil

[–] 0laura@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've heard some people talk about how NFTs could maybe be used to replace concert tickets and stuff like that somehow I think? not sure what advantages that would have. maybe NFTs could be used as a less invasive sort of DRM?

[–] pancakes@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is putting it on the blockchain advantageous versus a centralized server? Obviously the argument isn't about reliability, so I just fail to get why they merit the significantly increased energy cost/ environmental damage.

[–] 0laura@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

well the one advantage would be that you aren't relying on some company to keep the servers running. I'm not a fan of NFTs, me struggling to come up with any uses for them should be a sign of that.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am relying on some company to keep the doors to the concert venue open, might as well depend on them to control the ticket too.

[–] 0laura@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

true, but right now it's mostly done through a third party. the argument I've heard from nft fans is that nfts would allow you to skip that step

[–] ColonelThirtyTwo@pawb.social 4 points 1 year ago

Everyone in this thread needs to go watch Line Go Up at Folding Ideas