this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
330 points (93.2% liked)

News

36993 readers
2072 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] laverabe@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Why not AOC? Really need some young blood and someone who is progressive. She also meets constitutional age requirements now.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I don't think the country as a whole has made that much progress yet. She'll probably have to choose a white guy unfortunately

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Yeah. It saddened and annoyed me seeing that article “can Harris rebuild Obama’s coalition?”- like. Uhm. No? What’s past is gone and can never truly rebuilt. Yes, the ship of Theseus is a new ship. And this is the Ship of Harris, anyway.

[–] laverabe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

We've made more than people think.

If you went back in time 100 years ago and told them who was president in 2008 and reelected again in 2012, they would put you in an insane asylum.

I think people really don't care about race or gender in POTUS as much as the media puts out, people really just want to not go bankrupt from medical debt, or not have to pay $500,000 for their childrens college and other "bread and butter" personal issues.

99% of the US is progressive, they just don't know it yet. Everyone benefits from improved policy, that message just needs to be communicated better in a way that even the most stubborn conservative will understand. Bernie Sanders was proof of that because he was capturing the working class and it terrified the 0.01%

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago

Just like Obama needed Biden. Harris also needs a white guy to appeal to (sub)conscious biases. DNC will probably push her towards a moderate so unlikely to be someone like AOC. We'll see.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’d love AoC for pres, and consolation prize of VP. (Don’t tell the corpo dems this but the VP job is usually a political dead end…)

The reality is you need to pick VPs defensively. Some one who makes a good presidential candidate generally doesn’t make a good VP candidate.

As much as I like AoC… I don’t mind Kelly.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

It used to be the setup job, you did VP before president.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because they know AOC + Harris will be way too scary for the "pathetically insecure white dudes" demographic.

[–] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Which sadly means swing states. And is where the election is truly won. AOC isn't going to help and potentially hurts.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Exactly. I'm not always the biggest fan of conventional political wisdom, but in this case I think it's fair to say that getting most of America to vote for a black woman will already be a pretty big deal, and move the needle forward significantly.

And Kamala doesn't need AOC to appeal to younger and more left wing voters. She's already pretty far left of her party on most issues, and has the record to prove it.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They're going to pick someone who is popular in a purple state, and is going to help calm people who want to see someone more mainstream. I'd love a progressive, but it's going to be a straight white male from a purple state. I'll be super surprised if it's anything else. And I get it: the #1 objective here is to win, and every decision has to be predicated on that.

And besides, AOC is really young and will have lots of opportunities.

[–] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 2 points 2 years ago

AOC is the future, as long as Dementia Don the racist rapist with 34 felonies that can't complete a coherent sentence doesn't get in this time.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I like AOC. But two women of color, one who is super progressive, sounds like a massive risk.

[–] HaleHirsute -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because she was mind-numbingly insisting Biden was fine so we can’t trust her judgement.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

There were a lot more rich people that had Biden's back until they didn't. It wasn't like she was the only one.