this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
209 points (99.1% liked)

science

23537 readers
454 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Twinkletoes@lemm.ee 37 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This could be a truly amazing discovery 💡

[–] apocalypticat@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Looks like you were downvoted by an anaerobic organism?

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Aww, come out of there Hulud

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There's someone out there who downvotes every single post they read.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Also casts doubt on markers discovered showing possible life on other planets. We missed a source of oxygen creation on our own planet. Who's to say there aren't other ways that both methane and carbon dioxide are present on other planets.

(I'm certain there's life on other planets. This just makes it less likely that a planets with all the signs is one of those planets)

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Methane’s a lot more complex of a molecule to occur on its own though

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Last article I read said of the three gasses, methane was the most common to occur without needing life to make it.