this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
1608 points (99.3% liked)

News

35749 readers
2294 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Plume@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1075 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (20 children)

People. We, the French, pulled a left-wing coalition out of our asses in less than a week and managed to "win" an election. You have months. Hope is permitted.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 130 points 2 years ago

It's very true. We've been brainwashed into a year long campaign mostly because it generates a lot of money for various parties but prior elections have proven it's mostly what happens in the last month that makes a difference.

Y'all are lucky you can make coalitions, though. This is more akin to your election if you only had centrists and far right running. Two party system and all that.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 99 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think you'll start to see a lot more excitement in the next few weeks.

[–] Tacos_y_margaritas@lemmynsfw.com 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm already noticing a lot of hype for Kamala 🤞

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I mean, ok, what's not to hype? The second Black president, but in two centuries, it would be the first woman. The right's heads will collectively explode if she wins.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Mmmm you know this would be quite the upside

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 41 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

So we need a French immigrant to help fix the government?

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 29 points 2 years ago (19 children)

"Hope and change" is back in it to win it.

Motherfucking Obama at it again.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] NewAgeOldPerson@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can someone find the "hope is kindled" gif from LoTR Return of the King? When Pipin lights the beacon of Minas Tirith. I can't find it.

[–] Wiz@midwest.social 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] NewAgeOldPerson@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

You are a wonderful human. May you find 20 bucks in a pocket of the next coat you put on

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

Thanks for your support! And very happy to see your success in France.

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You, the French, have not been the target of a 40 year war against public education by the right wing. Americans are on average significantly less capable of rational thought because of it. Source: I am an American raised in the crippled education system I mentioned before.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 years ago (27 children)

It’s a bit naive to think Western Europe hasn’t been under attack from the right wing at least as long as the US has. They’ve had wars over it that never really reached US shores, and it never really went away. All of the strategies that have been used in the US were piloted and honed in Europe – look up the activities there by Manafort, Stone, Bannon, etc. all the same names who have been implementing the shit you’re seeing in the US were active in Western and Eastern Europe years before this. It’s been going on there far longer.

It’s amazing to me that people in the US haven’t been paying attention to what’s gone on there and learning from their successes.

load more comments (27 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

A "long" election campaign in the UK is 6 weeks. In 1992 they had one that was just 30 days.

Months is plenty of time, especially in the modern world. Maybe 250 years ago it was necessary to campaign for months on end so that the candidate could personally travel by train to every state. But, with modern media (both traditional and social), there's no real reason for campaigns to be as long as they are. The only reason they're this long is that the thought is that the earlier you start campaigning, the better. So, each side keeps starting earlier and earlier, making it effectively into a neverending campaign cycle.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Wiz@midwest.social 12 points 2 years ago

Thank you, French. You're awesome. I was losing hope, and yet a miracle happened.

Good job.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Props to the French voters for shutting out the Rally.

Most of the French voters.

Damn good job in the second round.

[–] Srh@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We don't really do coalitions here. Our voting system doesn't allow for it.

It does happen within Congress itself though, when different sects of the two parties cross the aisle to join with the other party on certain issues. But since Congress doesn't elect a prime minister, it doesn't happen for the presidency.

[–] Plume@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 2 years ago

I know. You're missing my point. :)

My point wasn't the coalition. My point was that we had 21 days to cobble something together and not only did we do it, we managed to win with it. It's not about the coalition, it's about building a campaign. You have months to do so.

And you're about to say that Trump had way longer to do so. Yes. So did the far right in our country, which barely even campaigned because all of the media were doing so on their behalf for the last two years and we still managed to outnumber them.

Trust me, my faith in the Democrats is barely existent. But still, I think it can be done.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Well spoken.

A few months in politics is an eternity. Yes, things are chaotic right now, but this is short term. We can unify after this. And we can win.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's a binary choice in the US presidential election, that isn't even based on the popular vote.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 3 points 2 years ago

The regime provides two choices, people do a circle jerk, regime gets their candidate.

Win win!

Unless you work for money

[–] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

Lord have merci

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why'd you put "win" in quotes?

[–] magnor@lemmy.magnor.ovh 44 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Because we only have a relative majority and now Macron is teaming up with the hard right (not the far right, the other right right that is not center right... Yeah, too much right is wrong) to deprive us of any path to government. Shit sucks. But it could have sucked way harder.

[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's also a strategic moderate move to keep the hard right from merging with Reform.

I'm hoping the left wing parties aren't locked out and still able to get progress made.

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Cuddling up to the hard right might look like a strategical move but it never works. Normalising them only shifts the discussion further to the right. And let's face it... in this post-factual time where all that matters is the narratives, giving them a platform will only help to brain-wash more people into believing right-wing fake-solutions to actual problems.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)