this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
59 points (94.0% liked)

GenZedong

8 readers
1 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

Serious posts can be posted here and/or in /c/GenZhou.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

this bit was the cherry on top

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Did the article in question make it peer review?

No, it was submitted to ArXiv which doesn't require or perform peer review.

[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That gives me some hope. But it's kind balanced out by the paper's call for more 'intellectual diversity' because the research uncovering extremism online tends to focus on the right wing and to be conducted by left-leaning academics. It couldn't be because overwhelmingly there is only right wing extremism and they're not going to dox themselves. Couldn't be that.

(We won't mention this guy, Matthew Goodwin, and his ilk, either, eh?)

[–] rjs001@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Even peer reviewed ones often have shockingly low standards. (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogdanov_affair)

[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 2 years ago

😯 I'd not heard of this one. I suppose this is what you should expect if you have over your entire intellectual apparatus to the yanks to keep the communists out.

Not dissimilar to the Sokal Affair, which eventually led to the book, [Fashionable Nonsense] (https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Fashionable_Nonsense). I'm not convinced that Sokal and Bricmont found what they claimed to find but they did reveal some flaws in the academic research process.