this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
68 points (86.2% liked)

History

1886 readers
1 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Absolutely not. About half the German casualties of the war occurred after that event. And most of the bombing too. An unfathomable amount of suffering could have been prevented, if the assassination had been successful.

[–] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Stauffenberg tried to kill Hitler because he thought Hitler wasn't effective. The war would have absolutely continued.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Wrong. Stauffenberg certainly wasn't a model democrat. But he understood that the way was lost and that they had to come to some sort of resolution. Any deal Germany could have gotten would have been harsh but far better than total destruction.

[–] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

not a model democrat

is doing some real heavy lifting there lol