this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
117 points (95.3% liked)

News

36889 readers
2764 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/17483630

They’re marketed as healthy, “dietitian-approved” meals and delivered directly to the homes of people seriously ill from cancer, diabetes, or heart disease: a Jimmy Dean frozen sausage breakfast sandwich, biscuits and gravy, a cheeseburger.

These are among the offerings sold by an Idaho-based company, Homestyle Direct, which is paid millions of dollars each year by taxpayer-funded state Medicaid programs to deliver what the company calls medically tailored meals. The company, which advertises delivering 7.8 million meals annually, has menus catering to customers trying to manage their cancer and diabetes, as well as “heart healthy” and “renal friendly” dishes.

However, multiple nutrition experts told STAT that many of Homestyle Direct’s offerings fall far short of what they’d consider medically tailored meals, a class of foods that have been proven to help those suffering from diet-related conditions improve their health and stay out of the hospital. Most also don’t appear to meet new voluntary accreditation standards crafted by medically-tailored meal providers.

Homestyle Direct to me doesn’t look like medically tailored meals at all — it doesn’t even look like generally healthy meals,” said Dariush Mozaffarian, director of the Food is Medicine Institute at Tufts University.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Let's shame Medicaid folks. I'm all for criticizing some things and behaviors but this really feels like a conservative dogwhistle attack. If someone who's receiving taxpayer funded food at home wants a cheeseburger now and then, I'm happy that my taxes are giving them some comfort.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 54 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

I thought the article would be about that, but it's about the quality of the food. It's supposed to be healthy food for sick people, but it doesn't meet the standards. That's a problem for patients with conditions that require controlled diets like diabetes

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How is that Medicaid's fault? Why isn't the title something like "Medicaid providers buying unhealthy food with federal funds"

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because we don't name the criminals in this country. It is always stupid government... Or some shit.

It would be nice to know what corpo scam is doing this. Prolly same guy selling prison and "school" food

[–] Furedadmins@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The company is even listed in the summary, you don't even need to read the article.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run -3 points 2 years ago

Well if you did the work, fucking name them here

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah I read the article too. I want to see the available options for each category. Hospitals offer food options in different categories that have a range of healthiness that seems questionable too. Then again, folks in hospitals under tremendous stress should be able to treat themselves time and again. I hope they improve their menu, don't get me wrong.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run -3 points 2 years ago

Hospitals are ran as a scam tho... Not sure what point you are making here unless you are trying to support position that hospitals and vendors are stealing taxpayer money via over priced and subpar products...

If food is shit and price is high... Who gets the difference in value?

Asking for a friend

[–] Bye@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Because it’s prescribed, it’s approved by Medicaid. If they approved eating grass as a treatment for thyroid cancer, I’d also be pissed. People trust their healthcare system to help them, because not everyone can be an expert. So it’s reasonable to expect Medicaid to only approve things for payment if they promote health. The cheeseburgers in question do not.

[–] mecfs@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

STAT News is generally well respected for medical/research news. I think the point of the article is to criticise the company for not making better foods/medicaid for not choosing a better company.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Unfortunately, I will not be at all surprised if right-wing outlets take that headline and run with it as a general criticism of Medicaid.

It's an irresponsible way to word a headline if they want to avoid that.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

This entire comment thread is based off someone who clearly thought this was just some sort of food subsidy program and not nutrition based... so I totally agree it will be taken wrong.

[–] mecfs@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

in that sense, agreed

[–] sunzu@kbin.run -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So because of bad PR we should not criticize corruption?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I didn't even imply such a thing, so I have no idea where you got that from.

Are you under the bizarre impression that there is no article, just a headline?

[–] sunzu@kbin.run -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I will not be at all surprised if right-wing outlets take that headline and run with it as a general criticism of Medicaid.

Your bigger concern here is what ring wing will do rather than the crime being committed.

If you don't mean that way, I apologies.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is not about what is a bigger concern. I can't speak for you, but most people can be concerned about more than one thing. In my case, one of those things was that I feel, and others apparently agree, that it is a headline which will be used as anti-Medicaid propaganda.

Why that doesn't concern you, I don't know. It should considering how effective propaganda has been throughout pretty much all of human history.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Media bias is always anti governments and pro "free enterprise"

Good point tbh

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Right, but the title doesn't even mention a company. Why.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 2 points 2 years ago

Because in this here country we don't name the perp when they are part of the club.

This is a huge lesson in this question.