this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
61 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42619 readers
267 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tuhriel 56 points 2 years ago (12 children)

I'm happy to dunk on musk as much as the next guy, but that title is bull.

Lightyears measure distance not time, how can they mess that up?

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 years ago

Because he's a long way away. Longer than miles away...maybe...light years?

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Musk <-------------------------------- LYs -----------------------------------> Self-Driving car

Any questions?

[–] k_rol@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Your point doesn't help me because it shows that we can fold space-time to create a shortcut with warp technology. Reference.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Because the self driving tech exists, but it's in the next galaxy

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 9 points 2 years ago

It's actually on earth, in metro trains

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Could be in the galaxy, but it would be safe to assume out of the solar system by quite some distance.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This might be the most lemmy comment I've ever seen.

[–] sexy_peach@beehaw.org 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] tesseract@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's extremely nuanced. 'Light years ahead' is correct since you are thinking about a race where one competitor is a long distance ahead of others. On the other hand, 'light years away' doesn't make sense, since we think of achievements in terms of time needed, rather than distance.

[–] ji17br@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

You’ve never heard the term miles ahead?

Tommy is miles ahead of Timmy in math class.

Clearly not referring to distance but it absolutely makes sense.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's like they can do the Kessel run in under 12 parsecs.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Maybe he needs 6.706e+8 miles more data

Edit, more math: that's 8.9 million hours of data at 75mph, or about 2 more hours of data per Tesla (at 75mph).

I'm actually surprised that musk doesn't talk about how many light years have been traveled.

Edit: first number was wrong? My TI89 is upstairs, so I'm trusting search engines

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

There are probably self-driving cars in some alien civilizations.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You have to read the title in context of millennial journalism title convention.

It is tiring, you aint wrong but there is context on why it makes sense tho

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 years ago

They aren't streets ahead.