this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
148 points (100.0% liked)

196

18159 readers
299 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
148
not a moral pr(ul)ecept (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by emstuff@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

sorry i got my rhetoric ™️ wrong last time i am just attempting to illustrate the thesis of Tolerance is not a moral precept by Yonatan Zunger so check that out if ur curious thanks babes <3

[Tolerance] is an agreement to live in peace, not an agreement to be peaceful no matter the conduct of others. A peace treaty is not a suicide pact.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ssfckdt@mastodon.cloud 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're trying to tie a different issue to the discussion here and it's simply non sequitur.

We're not talking about restricting speech at a legal level, we're talking about opposing bad speech with good speech or by cultivating private fora where good speech is encouraged and bad speech discouraged.

You literally jumped down the pitfall of the rhetoric of the bigoted folks that I alluded to. Excellent aim, wrong target.