this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
947 points (97.5% liked)

Funny

11079 readers
1434 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] z00s@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They're shit cars but gatekeeping manhood is even shittier

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hmm. Normally I'd be inclined to agree, but this really doesn't feel like it's punching at men or manliness. It's more just saying no one will find you attractive if you have a cybertruck. And we all know you can be a man as well as completely unfuckable at the same time.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"You will not get laid" is sorta the basic insult directed at men.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only because we associate sexuality and "getting laid" with manhood. They aren't the same. Are asexual men less men? No one's gatekeeping manhood in this image, they're gatekeeping sexuality.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But we do associate it with manhood. Until we move on from that mindset, it is an attack on someone's manhood

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We are not moving on today apparently, though a few above tried.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well I wouldn't have expected us to make a societal change in a day

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Societal change starts with the individual. If one person today has changed their views, it's a step.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not doubting that, I'm just saying "we" as a society still associates the ability to get laid with manliness. And that's not changing anytime soon

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And the way we move on from that is by each of us, individually, deciding that's not an attack on manhood.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Right, but to see the difference takes time. Some people are more hung up on the current view than others.

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

It is not gatekeeping manhood, buying a Cybertruck is a clear sign that the man lacks common sense and has more money than brains, two very important red flags. The only women he will attract are the kind that like men with more money than brains. She is just setting her standards high.

[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] z00s@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] FreakinSteve@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My manhood isnt affected at all by this. The "truck" is definitely shittier.

[–] z00s@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Still doesn't mean that it should be gate kept