this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
151 points (99.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

7062 readers
336 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
151
Big oil quietly walks back on climate pledges as global heat records tumble (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 2 years ago by cxtinac@sh.itjust.works to c/climate@slrpnk.net
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The fossil fuel industry has massively profited from selling a dangerous product and now innocent people and governments across the globe are paying the price for their recklessness

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kozy138@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

One could easily argue that property destruction of nonliving machines is not violence. Violence is the harm or destruction of living organisms.

Therefore, it is machines that are violent, as they are physically destroying and killing the ecosystems for profit. And destroying them is an act of self defense.

There are even studies being done to show just how much CO2 is prevented from polluting the atmosphere from acts of eco-sabatoge. Examples: offset.labr.io

[–] empiricism@sustainability.masto.host 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

@kozy138

"Therefore, it is machines that are violent"

That's incorrect as machines have no agency. Of course, violent people can use machines to do violent acts.

[–] kozy138@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

If they have no agency, wouldn't that mean that breaking them is nonviolent?