News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
The 2016 primary was super delegate bullshit
In the 2016 DNC Primaries:
15,805,136 people voted for Hillary Clinton before considering Delegate allotment, 16,847,084 after.
12,029,699 people voted for Bernie Sanders.
If we didn't have a nation of 340 Million Fuckwits then maybe we could get more than 5% of the population to select our future leaders.
Oh, come on. You can't justify a corrupt process by pointing to the final results of the corrupt process.
No but I can justify a democratic process by pointing to the much much higher number of people voting for the candidate who won.
...In an unfair election with the organizing body tipping the scale all throughout the process. So no, you can't point to the votes to wave away the corruption that influenced those votes.
Lmao
You need to grapple with this and figure out how to acknowledge the damage the DNC did to the party in 2016. You are only continuing to hurt party unity by pretending it didn't happen.
I'm not saying Bernie would definitely have won or anything. Chances are Hillary would have won in a fair election anyway. I'm saying the people were robbed of a fair election so we can't know what would have happened. If you're truly interested in justifying democracy you should be outraged by that rather than denying it.
But sure, a pithy "lmao" definitely does the trick too.
*Lmao that resulted in Trump being president
*Lmao, that user thinks people selecting a leader through voting is corrupt/undemocratic
People are selecting from candidates chosen by two private parties. "You'll vote for who we tell you to vote for" isn't very democratic.
People are selecting candidates chosen by primary elections. It's a democratic process.
Oh yeah? Who were our options this go around?
Just some nobody independent who caucuses with dems named Bernie Sanders, you've probably never heard of him?
EDIT: To clarify, these were the 2020 primary results. There are ongoing 2024 primaries as well, but an incumbent president has never been defeated in a primary in all of US History.
That's like claiming McDonalds makes the best burger because they sell the most.
You're literally making an argument against bare definition democracy, right now.
Sure thing, buddy.