this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
271 points (95.3% liked)

Science Memes

16131 readers
1160 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kerrigor@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

The "cleared its orbit" requirement is too arbitrary and non-scientific. We should've gone the other direction and classified more objects as planets.

[–] Skaryon@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Feels like we can agree to disagree on that one but I hope we can all agree that Neil deGrasse Tyson is fucking annoying.

[–] Kerrigor@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

While we can disagree on the latter portion, the first sentence is simply fact. The IAU does not provide any guidelines based on quantifiable data for this requirement.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAU_definition_of_planet
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clearing_the_neighbourhood

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

I like him.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago

well yeah it's quite readily admitted to be non-scientific, scientists generally just use "celestial object" afaik.

[–] Umbrias@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Then we'd have several hundred to a few thousand planets and need a new term for the larger celestial objects anyway. Seems silly. Planet is already arbitrary.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Unironically this